is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
This purely hypothetical thing isn't at all hypothetical after all is it?
Is the designer based overseas? (Hopes)
Is the designer based overseas? (Hopes)
-
- Posts: 8144
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:56 am
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
For luggage carrying purposes, I specified a slightly higher BB when getting Brant to design my Pact frame.
- In Reverse
- Posts: 1822
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Manchester
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
I'm saying nothing
They are not, and they're very highly thought of by several people on here which is why they picked up this particular bit of hypothetical custom.Is the designer based overseas? (Hopes)
- In Reverse
- Posts: 1822
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Manchester
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
What was your thinking here?ScotRoutes wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:15 pm For luggage carrying purposes, I specified a slightly higher BB when getting Brant to design my Pact frame.
-
- Posts: 8144
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:56 am
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
Ah - higher BB means higher saddle. Wee legs + low saddle + big wheels leaves little space for a seatpack. Of course, there's a reduction in the size of the frame triangle but I rarely use a frame bag anyway so as long as I can fit two 750ml bottles, I don't mind.In Reverse wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:47 pmWhat was your thinking here?ScotRoutes wrote: ↑Tue Nov 24, 2020 11:15 pm For luggage carrying purposes, I specified a slightly higher BB when getting Brant to design my Pact frame.
Higher BB also results in fewer pedal strikes of course. I take that as a pleasant side-effect.
- In Reverse
- Posts: 1822
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Manchester
-
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:39 am
- Location: Southern Cataluña
- Contact:
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
Purely conjecture Andy but did the designer make any reference to your frame having turnups and a button fly?They are not, and they're very highly thought of by several people on here which is why they picked up this particular bit of hypothetical custom
- In Reverse
- Posts: 1822
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Manchester
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
Taken an hour to get my head round this Duncan. It isn't him, no.pistonbroke wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 9:57 am
Purely conjecture Andy but did the designer make any reference to your frame having turnups and a button fly?
-
- Posts: 2136
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:39 am
- Location: Southern Cataluña
- Contact:
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
Ha ha, on reflection I thought I was being a bit cryptic. However his "signature dish" is fag paper tyre clearance and making the chainstays too short. I spent many happy hours grinding lumps off front mechs to make them fit
- In Reverse
- Posts: 1822
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Manchester
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
The geo I was asking to partly copy is one of his, including the short chainstays. The handling is razor-sharp because of it but the lean dimensions/overall width on the BB area/rear triangle does give it a bit of lateral flex which is noticeable if you're cornering hard with luggage on the bike...
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
If you have a 29+ frame why on earth would you not want to run biggest tyres possible in it?!
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
because you want to ride it on the road sometimes, and dont have the luxury of a roadbike.
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
What about a Vee tyre speedster? They’re basically a 29x2.8 semi-slick
- fatbikephil
- Posts: 6633
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:51 pm
- Location: Fife
- Contact:
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
You need Duro Crux's 29 x 3.25. They are bit sluggish on the road but who cares - they look fab and off road the grip is unbelievable.
-
- Posts: 2380
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:52 pm
- Location: Peoples Republic of Devon
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
Yes indeedy. I’ve always run the widest tyreon the widest rim (FatLab 55)Not sure those Crux’s would squeeze on into my 2013 Krampus frame. Maybe only with the rear wheel at the sweet spot in the horizontal drop outs. Could sit one up front though.
Vee do a 3.25 Bulldozer tyre as well but never fancied trying it out having been pretty disappointed with their Trax Fatty.
Having said that. If you’re not riding off road there’s nothing wrong with running narrower rims and tyres. I’ve seen a few folk doing that with ECR’s and Krampus online when they’re doing road/dirt road touring.
Tried to retire my Krampus by moving it’s bits onto my Fargo frame this week but got the jitters and put it all back today having not even ridden the Fargo! Can’t bring myself to loose that 29+ wagon wheeling feeling
....even if it is hard work moving the beast.
I’ve begun lusting after the Fatster Alex Pilkington rides so fast.
If you are going through hell, keep going.
WSC
WSC
- Cheeky Monkey
- Posts: 3915
- Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:48 pm
- Location: Leeds ish
- Contact:
- In Reverse
- Posts: 1822
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2015 9:08 pm
- Location: Manchester
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
Just had a quick look around and can't see any actually in stock, so that does put a dampener on the suggestion. Stocks of plus tyres seems to have dropped off the earth.
- fatbikephil
- Posts: 6633
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:51 pm
- Location: Fife
- Contact:
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
I'd be giving vee tyres a wide berth. Schwalbe g ones seem to be the got "plus" gravel tyre https://blog.jonesbikes.com/ 2.35's on 55mm rimsPaulB2 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 26, 2020 10:40 amJust had a quick look around and can't see any actually in stock, so that does put a dampener on the suggestion. Stocks of plus tyres seems to have dropped off the earth.
Last edited by fatbikephil on Thu Nov 26, 2020 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
[/quote]
I'd be giving vee tyres a wide berth. Schwalbe g ones seem to be the got "plus" gravel tyre https://blog.jonesbikes.com/riding-grav ... re-widths/ 2.35's on 55mm rims
[/quote]
Link not working
I'd be giving vee tyres a wide berth. Schwalbe g ones seem to be the got "plus" gravel tyre https://blog.jonesbikes.com/riding-grav ... re-widths/ 2.35's on 55mm rims
[/quote]
Link not working
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
The Vee Speedsters appear a bit tougher than G-One 2.35s. I love the G-Ones but they're worryingly thin for anything spiky, yet the thin casing is what makes them so fast in places. I had an amazingly fast, dry, fingers-crossed day on the Ridgeway on my Jones with them on but I felt like I was pushing my luck the whole way over those flints.
The problem with Speedsters is that central strip tread design picks up tiny shards and flints really effectively so though they might be a bit thicker in the casing they still flat more than you might expect - far better tubeless than tubed and expect you'd be using tubeless with +sized version anyway. Good tyres otherwise.
The problem with Speedsters is that central strip tread design picks up tiny shards and flints really effectively so though they might be a bit thicker in the casing they still flat more than you might expect - far better tubeless than tubed and expect you'd be using tubeless with +sized version anyway. Good tyres otherwise.
- fatbikephil
- Posts: 6633
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:51 pm
- Location: Fife
- Contact:
Re: is a plus bike designed from the tyres up ?
I'd be giving vee tyres a wide berth. Schwalbe g ones seem to be the got "plus" gravel tyre https://blog.jonesbikes.com/riding-grav ... re-widths/ 2.35's on 55mm rims
[/quote]
Link not working
[/quote]
Changed it to the blog header page. dunno why t won't let me post the link from the blog itself......
https://blog.jonesbikes.com/