Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:06 pm
All those Fellow Veloviewer geeks will see there Eddington number
Mines at 41
Just wondering what others are?
Mines at 41
Just wondering what others are?
https://bearbonesbikepacking.co.uk/phpBB3/
Eddington
https://bearbonesbikepacking.co.uk/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=6817
Page 1 of 2
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:09 pm
I'm one ride off 39.
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:49 pm
56, which seems rather high considering I've done chuff all riding lately 
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:54 pm
It doesn't run out though IanIan wrote:56, which seems rather high considering I've done chuff all riding lately
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 8:17 pm
Just signed up to veloviewer, what is it and where do it find it?
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 8:36 pm
Mine is 58, though this is from swinney.net rather than veloviewer which is only my last few weeks of rides.
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 8:51 pm
Depends what units you're using.
56
Also 9 inches.
Hurrah for willy waving
56
Also 9 inches.
Hurrah for willy waving
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 9:02 pm
A nice round 50. Can't see the text box with my next steps on it....
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 9:25 pm
On VV click on th dots next to the Edington number on your summary pagejohnnystorm wrote:A nice round 50. Can't see the text box with my next steps on it....
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 9:27 pm
Dude I'm using imperial units - miles.GregMay wrote:Depends what units you're using.
56
Also 9 inches.
Hurrah for willy waving
Inches, pah!
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 9:44 pm
Should've said I'm on my phone and it displays it badly.ianfitz wrote:On VV click on th dots next to the Edington number on your summary pagejohnnystorm wrote:A nice round 50. Can't see the text box with my next steps on it....
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 9:47 pm
On my phone also, and really can't make sense of it. It's been a long day, and it's too much for my addled brain 
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 10:24 pm
It's very obvious on a full size computer.
But I'm on my phone too atm so can't show you the screen shots
But I'm on my phone too atm so can't show you the screen shots
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 10:28 pm
Actually, works fine on phone too.
Go to veloviewer. Update etc. go to summary tab. Scroll down to activity summary section. Click on the box with the dots in just to the right of your Edington number.
Will bring up a graph showing progress
Go to veloviewer. Update etc. go to summary tab. Scroll down to activity summary section. Click on the box with the dots in just to the right of your Edington number.
Will bring up a graph showing progress
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 10:29 pm
52 miles, 65 km
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 10:40 pm
I can't be the only one thinking it, so can I just ask ..... WTF is an Eddington number? Simple answers only please, thank you
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 10:44 pm
I'm on 58 with just 2 rides to make it 60. Hoping to achieve that by end of the year.
I'm also enjoying the Explorer scores. So far:
5691 tiles, average of 3.161 mi per tile
Max square 13x13
Hoping to get that to a 15x15 square in the next few days (I think just one more tile visit will do it).
I'm also enjoying the Explorer scores. So far:
5691 tiles, average of 3.161 mi per tile
Max square 13x13
Hoping to get that to a 15x15 square in the next few days (I think just one more tile visit will do it).
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 10:46 pm
Cycling metric designed by Thomas Eddington.
Basically the number of rides that you have completed that are a minimum of that distance.
So an Eddington of 10 means that you have done 10 rides that have been a minimum of 10 miles.
50 score is 50 rides that where a minimum of 50 miles, so it gets exponentially more difficult the bigger the number.
Basically the number of rides that you have completed that are a minimum of that distance.
So an Eddington of 10 means that you have done 10 rides that have been a minimum of 10 miles.
50 score is 50 rides that where a minimum of 50 miles, so it gets exponentially more difficult the bigger the number.
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 10:51 pm
With youCycling metric designed by Thomas Eddington.
Basically the number of rides that you have completed that are a minimum of that distance.
So an Eddington of 10 means that you have done 10 rides that have been a minimum of 10 miles.
50 score is 50 rides that where a minimum of 50 miles, so it gets exponentially more difficult the bigger the number.
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 11:07 pm
Thanks for the explanation as I was confused as hell!!!
Anyways, 41 miles / 52km.
I'll take that.
Anyways, 41 miles / 52km.
I'll take that.
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 11:26 pm
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 11:30 pm
Mine's 58, but I uploaded tour divide as one activity, if I had done each day separately, it should be around 78
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 11:45 pm
Dont mean to be a nae sayer, but am I right in thinking it dosnt take into account road / off road, hilly / flat etc etc.
Re: Eddington
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 11:51 pm
You are correct.FLV wrote:Dont mean to be a nae sayer, but am I right in thinking it dosnt take into account road / off road, hilly / flat etc etc.
It is length only and obviously longer rides are easier on road and with sympathetic terrain.
Re: Eddington
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2015 12:00 am
Yep. Distance only, the majority of mine are Mtb miles but not differentiatedFLV wrote:Dont mean to be a nae sayer, but am I right in thinking it dosnt take into account road / off road, hilly / flat etc etc.