See the below as an example from another thread:
I'm not one to ever trouble the pointy end of an event but I do really like the social aspects of riding with/near/amongst a bunch of like-minded fools over multiple days whilst bikepacking and so I have to disagree with this assertion (with the idea as a whole, not specifically with James - even though I quoted his example).
What do people think in general? I just don't get why the mass starts should be more for those who are going to bugger off into the distance and be less sociable than for those who like to ride in proximity to lots of others doing the same thing at the same time and have a thoroughly nice time whilst doing it?
I've ridden the Tuscany Trail five years in a row now and it's precisely this mentality that I enjoy. I ride my bike, all day every day, putting in significant effort but by no means thrashing myself to death and all the while I'm enjoying nice meals, local wines (evenings only obviously) and the constant chat and banter of the other participants who happen to loosely match my pace.
As far as I can see there's less benefit of the mass start for the 5, 10, 15 or so people flogging themselves to within an inch of their lives out front on their own.
Not for a second, suggesting that they shouldn't participate in any grand depart but out of the two groups (racers vs tourers) I think the latter have arguably more to offer to and gain from mass starting events.
Just a thought and my two cents.
Please feel free to poo poo the idea as I'm genuinely interested in hearing other folks opinions.....