"official" UK Bikepacking Routes
Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew
- Bearbonesnorm
- Posts: 23983
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
- Location: my own little world
Re: "official" UK Bikepacking Routes
I often think it's a shame that SEO drives so much content on-line because the content could often be so much better if that wasn't the case.
May the bridges you burn light your way
Re: "official" UK Bikepacking Routes
The mainstream is generally sub standard isn't it / popularity a poor guide to quality. ..says me who's clearly well past 40Bearbonesnorm wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 1:44 pm I often think it's a shame that SEO drives so much content on-line because the content could often be so much better if that wasn't the case.
- johnnystorm
- Posts: 3958
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:55 pm
- Location: Eastern (Anglia) Front
Re: "official" UK Bikepacking Routes
Peaked at 60k and usually managed over 40k unique visitors a month.jameso wrote: ↑ I think the results will be linked to how much traffic the site gets generally, can't imagine Advntr traffic is very high (yet/that's the aim isn't it).
Re: "official" UK Bikepacking Routes
TBH I'm not sure what a good hit rate is. It sounds like a good number? I meant not very high vs Red Bull in Whitestone's post, but 40k+ a month is more than I'd have guessed. (edit, that's not meant to sound as it probably does, I mean it's my lack of ability to judge not the lack of site value!)johnnystorm wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 7:08 pmPeaked at 60k and usually managed over 40k unique visitors a month.jameso wrote: ↑ I think the results will be linked to how much traffic the site gets generally, can't imagine Advntr traffic is very high (yet/that's the aim isn't it).
I did look up the ad revenue value of the TNR site (much less than 40k a month, unsuprisingly) and it was about tuppence