Would you?
https://timmermade.com/product/dyneema- ... ic-jacket/
Russell, Russell lightweight jacket
Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew
-
JohnClimber
- Posts: 3915
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Russell, Russell lightweight jacket
I'd have a pair of these with a reinforced bottom area.
https://timmermade.com/product/dyneema- ... ric-pants/
https://timmermade.com/product/dyneema- ... ric-pants/
Blog - thecyclerider.com
-
Bearbonesnorm
- Posts: 23933
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
- Location: my own little world
Re: Russell, Russell lightweight jacket
I'd just buy a roll of bin bags and save myself $249. Very little difference in terms of performance.
May the bridges you burn light your way
-
lune ranger
- Posts: 2380
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:52 pm
- Location: Peoples Republic of Devon
Re: Russell, Russell lightweight jacket
Maybe better because it would have a bit of stretch.Bearbonesnorm wrote: ↑Thu Oct 21, 2021 9:48 am I'd just buy a roll of bin bags and save myself $249. Very little difference in terms of performance.
If you are going through hell, keep going.
WSC
WSC
-
redefined_cycles
- Posts: 9367
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2016 8:19 am
- Location: Dewsbury, West Yorkshire
Re: Russell, Russell lightweight jacket
ventilation is done mechanically with a waterproof full zip
Re: Russell, Russell lightweight jacket
I understand why it's expensive, but I can't see what it's offering. Very light, no breathability. You may as well have one of those disposable ponchos. Not that I agree with throwaway products.
Re: Russell, Russell lightweight jacket
Who's Russell?
Re: Russell, Russell lightweight jacket
Whose rustle? Not Greg's clearly.