‘Gravel’ bikes?

Talk about anything.

Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew

Post Reply
User avatar
BigdummySteve
Posts: 2974
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:16 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by BigdummySteve »

I’m sure this has been done before, possibly even by myself, but entertain me.
I’ve a Fargo which I love, it’s a mountain bike which just happens to be built to suit dropbars.
Recently I’ve been doing a lot of mixed riding, roads, tracks and even proper gravel!
Even with the vittoria terreno‘s I’ve fitted (2.25”) I’m often over biked on the Fargo.
I usually still have all the bags/ fittings attached so potentially could drop some weight but it I fitted a skinny set of wheels/tyres in the Fargo would I be a world away from a light weight gravel bike?
We’re all individuals, except me.

I woke up this morning but I’m still in the dark
redefined_cycles
Posts: 9282
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2016 8:19 am
Location: Dewsbury, West Yorkshire

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by redefined_cycles »

I put some slicks on my IndyFab steel deluxe once... Then got a road bike following that. 5 or so years later I concluded that i could have made the Indyfab into an vaguely exciting road/gravel bike...

I'd not change the wheels. Just the tyres and you're off... i want a silent freehub too btw :o
User avatar
BigdummySteve
Posts: 2974
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:16 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by BigdummySteve »

30 years ago! I used to have a skinny slick shod wheel set for my diamond back, used to go roadie hunting, blast past them and casually take the first available turn off :lol:
We’re all individuals, except me.

I woke up this morning but I’m still in the dark
Lazarus
Posts: 3599
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:49 am

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by Lazarus »

would I be a world away from a light weight gravel bike?
Nah only about 4-6 lb s away :wink:

Its a steel frame it will never be lightweight but I am sure it would work
User avatar
BigdummySteve
Posts: 2974
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:16 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by BigdummySteve »

So about the weight difference of 4 water bottles, or perhaps 6 if I took all the bags off.
We’re all individuals, except me.

I woke up this morning but I’m still in the dark
User avatar
Alpinum
Posts: 2603
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2014 5:38 pm

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by Alpinum »

BigdummySteve wrote: Wed Jul 15, 2020 11:16 pm the Fargo would I be a world away from a light weight gravel bike?
People get obsessed with bike weights.
The less it matters, the more some seem obsessed with it.

Have you ever seen the numbers (timed, hilly laps) of a comparison of two equal bikes one with a few kg more weight?
Marginal. Absolutely marginal.
It's in trail biking where the difference can be felt more, fast, regular direction changes, riding over boulders, down chutes, hoping over streams, accelerating out of switchbacks, braking, short, very steep tech climbs etc. All this happens constantly when riding single tracks.
This is where weight is felt.

Two or three kg's more weight on gradual climb 1 h on a smooth dirt road or tarmac will have about the same effect on your riding time and effectivity as wiggling with your right toe for 20 seconds.

I'd definately stick with the Fargo. Many options on that frame.

When I want to make my bikes fast simply put on faster tyres.
When I want to go fast on easy terrain it'll be a faster rolling, more subtle tyre. I grab the bars inside to loose some drag where possible. Rolling resistance and aero have much more significance than weight for anything between road and very easy single track riding.

And narrow tyres aren't always faster, same goes for higher air pressure.
restlessshawn
Posts: 1459
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:04 pm
Location: Scottish Borders

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by restlessshawn »

My steel (+ carbon forks) CX/Gravel bike weighs in about 20.75 lbs, I'd be surprised if a Fargo could get anywhere near that?

It doesn't make me faster in any way but a nice lightish bike just feels nice to ride in some ways, lively.

If I already had a Fargo I liked I would probably just use that though.
ScotRoutes
Posts: 8144
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:56 am

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by ScotRoutes »

a nice lightish bike just feels nice to ride in some ways, lively.
Yep. I still hanker after a nice lightweight cross/gravel bike in place of my Amazon - and that's Ti/carbon. So, I guess my answer to the OP would be that the Fargo would be far from ideal, though obviously usable.
User avatar
Bearbonesnorm
Posts: 23905
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: my own little world

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by Bearbonesnorm »

There's so many other factors than simply weight - the available gearing and obviously riding position will both make a real difference to how 'easy' any bike is to ride. :wink:
May the bridges you burn light your way
mattpage
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:35 am

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by mattpage »

I am a self confessed weight weenie, so I may think differently to others.

Does weight make a difference? Yes.
Does it matter? It depends.

I think it comes down to % of your body weight, so lighter riders will feel it more.
The style of riding also matters, racing for example it really can help. Rotating weight is easier to notice, but also the centre of gravity..

But as Stu says, lots of other factors and tyres are a huge one. Have a light bike and stick some slow rolling tyres on and it will suck. Have a light 29er MTB but low gearing and it will feel slow on the road and flats.

There is also the mental aspect. If you think its faster, because you have saved weight that can help :grin:
User avatar
fatbikephil
Posts: 6511
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:51 pm
Location: Fife
Contact:

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by fatbikephil »

I ditched my fargo for the straggler. (sounds like gravelw***ers annonymous there) Seriously the fargo frame is a lot stiffer than your typical (steel) gravel bike (my mates firs gen fargo was a lot springier than my second gen one - they did this to address wobble issues when loaded up) so a fargo on 40's will be lot harsher than (say) a straggler on 40's. Overall I've found the straggler to be as comfy as the Fargo was and pretty much as good on the dirt. I convinced my self that the benefits of the extra tyre width on the fargo was compromised by the drop bars. In other words the drop bars were the limiting factor for rough stuff, not the tyres. Or something. Try it, see what happens
wriggles
Posts: 798
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 9:52 am
Location: Dumfries & Galloway

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by wriggles »

Sold my Fargo as it sat right between my 29er hardtail and my Camino Ti gravel bike. If doing an off-road ride with road linking prefer hardtail, if doing road ride with off road linking then prefer gravel bike. Obvs.

Would not be without either of them.
Fat tyre kicker
Posts: 982
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2015 8:39 pm
Location: Cheshire

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by Fat tyre kicker »

BSD...I had a very similar conundrum about 18 months ago, I have an old school
Cannondale F500, but my main ride is a Salsa Mukluk ( plus a 9 zero 7 build),
I had the itch for a gravel bike and bought a Genesis Vagabond frame & forks,
Built it up with nice kit etc......first 20odd mile ride was hugely disappointing
To the point that I broke it up and sold it on, if I'm doing a towpath/gravel
Ride I put 2.5 Surly E/t's on the Muk, it's a far nicer ride, after I've tested the
New build, one will stay fat and one will be getting a 27.5+ wheelset built :-bd
User avatar
benp1
Posts: 4051
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:36 pm
Location: South Downs

Re: ‘Gravel’ bikes?

Post by benp1 »

Thing is, if you buy a gravel bike will you end up bike buying a hardtail (I know your fargo is a hardtail, but I mean a flat bar one) to balance is out
Post Reply