heart rate

Talk about anything.

Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew

Post Reply
paramart
Posts: 430
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 3:19 pm
Location: cannock chase

heart rate

Post by paramart »

since going to the gym because I injured myself with an otb into a tree, iv'e noticed an heart rate warning on all the equipment I use even though I am no where near out of breath and can easily go harder, today I went for a run and got out of breath and pushed it a bit my average was 154 with it peaking at 171, I seem to hit my max 163 pretty easily, is it because i'm getting over the hill a bit and if I do go over my max hr will it kill me or will it get stronger, never bothered about it before I saw the warnings ta mart
it's not that I can and others can't, it's that I will and others won't.
lune ranger
Posts: 2380
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:52 pm
Location: Peoples Republic of Devon

Re: heart rate

Post by lune ranger »

Very broadly speaking your max hr would be in the region of 220 minus your age.
Your max sustainable he about 60-80% of that.
I think the important part you picked out was your perceived level of effort was low.
From the info you give I don't think you've got any particular worries unless your heart rhythm was irregular.
Was the gym equipment alarm set by someone aiming to train in a particular hr zone? 170bpm isn't really very high.
This isn't a consultation and I'm not a doctor but I do have 20 years experience ICU nursing in the RAF and NHS
If you are going through hell, keep going.
WSC
User avatar
johnnystorm
Posts: 3954
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2012 9:55 pm
Location: Eastern (Anglia) Front

Re: heart rate

Post by johnnystorm »

If you've just started training or just had a big op don't trying finding your max heart rate just yet. If you're otherwise OK do a ramp test and see what you do actually max out at. Have the gym set it at 170bpm to stop their clientele dropping like flies?
Image
paramart
Posts: 430
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 3:19 pm
Location: cannock chase

Re: heart rate

Post by paramart »

lune ranger wrote:Very broadly speaking your max hr would be in the region of 220 minus your age.
Your max sustainable he about 60-80% of that.
I think the important part you picked out was your perceived level of effort was low.
From the info you give I don't think you've got any particular worries unless your heart rhythm was irregular.
Was the gym equipment alarm set by someone aiming to train in a particular hr zone? 170bpm isn't really very high.
This isn't a consultation and I'm not a doctor but I do have 20 years experience ICU nursing in the RAF and NHS
lune 220-57=163 just wondering if going above this figure regularly is good or bad always been fit and try to maintain it, thought it might be my biological clock saying slow down,
it's not that I can and others can't, it's that I will and others won't.
ianfitz
Posts: 3642
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:33 pm

Re: heart rate

Post by ianfitz »

paramart wrote:
lune ranger wrote:Very broadly speaking your max hr would be in the region of 220 minus your age.
Your max sustainable he about 60-80% of that.
I think the important part you picked out was your perceived level of effort was low.
From the info you give I don't think you've got any particular worries unless your heart rhythm was irregular.
Was the gym equipment alarm set by someone aiming to train in a particular hr zone? 170bpm isn't really very high.
This isn't a consultation and I'm not a doctor but I do have 20 years experience ICU nursing in the RAF and NHS
lune 220-57=163 just wondering if going above this figure regularly is good or bad always been fit and try to maintain it, thought it might be my biological clock saying slow down,

This calculation is an average of all people. Do not assume it gives you a correct Cavour.

I know a 57 year old with a max of 220 and a 22 year old with a max of 168. Both are top age group performers.
Image
lune ranger
Posts: 2380
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:52 pm
Location: Peoples Republic of Devon

Re: heart rate

Post by lune ranger »

Ver broadly speaking...

The actual number depends on a number of factors. Genetics, sex, previous training, present condition, time of day, body temperature, did you just drink coffee etc etc.
If you felt ok then you are probably ok.
If you are worried have a feel of your pulse. If it is regular then you are almost certain ok. Any history of heart disease in you or your family? See your GP.
I personally find training to hr hard. I go quite high, feel fine and can sustain it for an age. Any attempt to stick in an 'endurance' zone quickly falls by the wayside.
If you are going through hell, keep going.
WSC
middleagedmadness
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2017 6:37 pm
Location: Tir Na Nog

Re: heart rate

Post by middleagedmadness »

Mart off the calculation mine should be 173 max , because of family history ( dad having 4 heart attacks before 40) and having high BP due to genetics doc told me to try and keep my max at around 150bpm ,can't manage to do it and I'm still here as long as you've no pains or head aches after I wouldn't worry too much ,it's a bit strange as my resting heart rate is normally around 48-53 BPM but I'm on all kinds of meds to keep things ticking
ScotRoutes
Posts: 8144
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:56 am

Re: heart rate

Post by ScotRoutes »

As above - the 220-age thing is basically bollocks. I'm 60 so would top out at 160bpm. I can comfortably exceed that for long periods with no duress.
User avatar
Mariner
Posts: 1793
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 2:37 pm
Location: East Devon

Re: heart rate

Post by Mariner »

I can comfortably exceed that for long periods with no duress.
The very simplistic explanation I was given re heart rate max and zones was that it is the average not the max that is important. (caveat)
I regularly exceeded 'max' on hills but at the end of a ride the average would be a very acceptable figure.
What you need to find out is how many times you can exceed mhr, how long long you can stay there and what is the recovery time?

The more time you spend 'training' in lower zones the more effort you can put in for longer and still be in your zone but it is different for each person.
At 71 I still use the zone settings calculated several years ago even though I am too ill to ride a bike at present and probably reach mhr just walking into town and back.
Zazen - nothing happens next this is it.
paramart
Posts: 430
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 3:19 pm
Location: cannock chase

Re: heart rate

Post by paramart »

thanks for the replies, mariner I know someone who trained using lower heart rates, he said it was difficult to keep within the limits allocated, he was exceptionally fit and I remember him saying he found it hard to hit his max hr after it.
it's not that I can and others can't, it's that I will and others won't.
User avatar
Mart
Posts: 1752
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:57 pm
Location: Oot 'n' aboot

Re: heart rate

Post by Mart »

Hey up Mart
I was told that 220 - age is a guide for ‘average’ people
Like you i could regularly exceed this when excercising but told not to worry as if you train and heart is in good shape then this rule is a load of cobblers. Your training your heart to beat faster and more efficiently! so can be higher than the rule

I don’t really bother tracking it now - i kinda know my levels and how much effort i need to put in
Do plan rest days too - your body will tell you when it needs a break or a day off

Bestter still, just ditch the HR monitor - it’s probably causing you all kinda stress :lol:
2924 miles per Gallon
User avatar
Richard G
Posts: 4909
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2015 9:09 am
Location: South Wales

Re: heart rate

Post by Richard G »

Interestingly, when I was fat and unfit I could sustain heart rates in the 180s for a comical amount of time. I have multi hour Strava rides where my average HR was 170+

5 years later, I wouldn't be able to sustain heart rates in the 170s without falling to bits, but what I can achieve with sub 160 is far in excess of what I was previously doing on 180.

As for worrying about it. As long as you don't suddenly find yourself in the 200+ range or feeling like your heart is skipping beats... don't. I regularly hit my max heart rate and I'm not dead yet.
lune ranger
Posts: 2380
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:52 pm
Location: Peoples Republic of Devon

Re: heart rate

Post by lune ranger »

Mart wrote:Hey up Mart
Just ditch the HR monitor - it’s probably causing you all kinda stress :lol:
Pretty sensible advice for the majority of the population I'd say.
Go on how you feel - perceived level of exertion if you are being posh - Go ride, enjoy it, ride further or faster as you're able. If you are dropping your pace (or onto your knees) ten minutes into an hours ride then you need to slow down and it 's pretty irrelevant what number your hrm is telling you.
If you are going through hell, keep going.
WSC
User avatar
whitestone
Posts: 7866
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 10:20 am
Location: Skipton(ish)
Contact:

Re: heart rate

Post by whitestone »

The 220-age formula, like most of the other generic formulae, is bobbins. By that reckoning my MHR should be 161. I can ride at 177bpm for about five minutes so even that is nowhere near my true MHR.

The only way to determine your MHR is via a ramp test but they are pretty nasty things to do properly.

For what we do I wouldn't worry about HR, generally you want to stay below the aerobic threshold which equates to around 70% MHR but if you can chat but not sing then that's about the level of effort.

At the other end of the scale my resting HR is pretty low. When I was having my pre-op they put me on an ECG to check for heart irregularities. The machine suddenly started screeching like a banshee. The nurse comes over and looks at the output, turns a dial or two and says: "Don't worry, it thinks you are dead!". On the way in to theatre the anaesthetist specifically told the staff not to worry about my still very low heart rate.
Better weight than wisdom, a traveller cannot carry
User avatar
Richard G
Posts: 4909
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2015 9:09 am
Location: South Wales

Re: heart rate

Post by Richard G »

That's common with cyclists, and great fun for freaking out inexperienced medical staff. :lol:
Asposium
Posts: 1632
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 5:39 pm
Location: Southampton

Re: heart rate

Post by Asposium »

Richard G wrote:That's common with cyclists, and great fun for freaking out inexperienced medical staff. :lol:
My rested resting heart rate is about 42

Has been known to get interesting looks.
lune ranger
Posts: 2380
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:52 pm
Location: Peoples Republic of Devon

Re: heart rate

Post by lune ranger »

Miguel Indurain's was 28bpm according to legend :o
If you are going through hell, keep going.
WSC
User avatar
Richard G
Posts: 4909
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2015 9:09 am
Location: South Wales

Re: heart rate

Post by Richard G »

Asposium wrote:My rested resting heart rate is about 42

Has been known to get interesting looks.
Well, it is the answer after all.
User avatar
ootini
Posts: 1820
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:45 pm

Re: heart rate

Post by ootini »

Sorry to hijack, but does anyone know of a cheapo wrist computer heart rate monitoring fitbit type thing that can set off an alarm when you hit a threshold bpm?
User avatar
whitestone
Posts: 7866
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 10:20 am
Location: Skipton(ish)
Contact:

Re: heart rate

Post by whitestone »

ootini wrote:Sorry to hijack, but does anyone know of a cheapo wrist computer heart rate monitoring fitbit type thing that can set off an alarm when you hit a threshold bpm?
I use to use Polar HRMs when I was running. Don't know what their cheapest model would be with threshold alarms. Check out dcrainmaker - he reviews pretty much every GPS/HRM/powermeter going.
Better weight than wisdom, a traveller cannot carry
Trail-rat
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2015 1:30 pm
Location: Between Aberdeen and the Cairngorms

Re: heart rate

Post by Trail-rat »

Wrist mounted hr is sporadic at best.

Not very good for dynamic intervals where hr is up and down alot as the lag is large.

Good for rough idea of where you were all day but not great at sport.
Post Reply