Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Talk about anything.

Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew

User avatar
Mr Arbuckle
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 6:40 pm

Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Mr Arbuckle »

What's your iron horse of choice for the wrt?
Fatbike, mountain bike or cx/gravel bike?
Image
User avatar
Single Speed George
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 4:36 pm
Location: Shap

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Single Speed George »

My only mountain bike ... Full ridged, single speed , charge cooker , 29wheels 2.4 tires . perfect for everything
User avatar
simon72
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:11 am

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by simon72 »

Fully rigid 29er with 40mm wide cx tyres. light and agile, bumpy and slow.
User avatar
Lawmanmx
Posts: 590
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2015 7:52 pm
Location: Wigan

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Lawmanmx »

Fat Again ... if i make it this time :???:
Sarah
Posts: 177
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2016 5:51 pm
Location: Lancashire

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Sarah »

Ogre :-bd

Not that I have other options :lol: fully rigid 29er with 2.1 cos that's what's on her. :roll:

Looking forward to it.
Sarah
User avatar
Bearbonesnorm
Posts: 23943
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: my own little world

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Bearbonesnorm »

If anyone is considering riding a fat bike, I can knock you up a route that will provide a level of justification to your choice to drag such a thing about ... should you so wish :wink:
May the bridges you burn light your way
User avatar
Mr Arbuckle
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 6:40 pm

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Mr Arbuckle »

I'm 90% self convinced my fatty is my iron horse of choice. I've tried to plan a route mainly on forest fire roads with a bit of single track and a few country lanes. Thanks norm for route offer but having spent 4 days in Dartmoor at the end of December bikepacking on the fatty I'm quite looking forward to an easy weekend in Wales :-bd
Image
User avatar
Bearbonesnorm
Posts: 23943
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: my own little world

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Bearbonesnorm »

Are you sure? I know some lovely sections of bog ideally suited to 4" or bigger tyres :wink:
May the bridges you burn light your way
User avatar
Mr Arbuckle
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 6:40 pm

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Mr Arbuckle »

Bearbonesnorm wrote:Are you sure? I know some lovely sections of bog ideally suited to 4" or bigger tyres :wink:
I may accidentally stumble on such delights. I'll let you know on Monday afternoon.
Image
User avatar
AlexGold
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2017 6:54 pm

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by AlexGold »

Hope my CX with 35mm Smart Sams will work, as it's that or the road bike with 23mm slicks!
User avatar
JohnClimber
Posts: 3920
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:41 pm

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by JohnClimber »

29er+
Artie Fufkin
Posts: 692
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:11 am
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Artie Fufkin »

Stooge 29"
User avatar
BigdummySteve
Posts: 2974
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:16 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by BigdummySteve »

ECR 29+, it's that or my wife's beach cruiser :shock:
We’re all individuals, except me.

I woke up this morning but I’m still in the dark
Stumpym4
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2015 9:12 pm

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Stumpym4 »

Pinnacle Ramin 3 plus, bit concerned about pedaling 3 inch rubber on tarmac climbs :( .. gonna be a slog !
any recommendations on different rubber that will roll easier ?
User avatar
Bearbonesnorm
Posts: 23943
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: my own little world

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Bearbonesnorm »

any recommendations on different rubber that will roll easier ?
2.8" Super Moto X might be worth a look. Not a light tyre but looks like it should roll well.

2.4" X-Kings would also be worth considering.
May the bridges you burn light your way
Stumpym4
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2015 9:12 pm

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Stumpym4 »

Bearbonesnorm wrote:
any recommendations on different rubber that will roll easier ?
2.8" Super Moto X might be worth a look. Not a light tyre but looks like it should roll well.

2.4" X-Kings would also be worth considering.
reckon the moto x will be ok on the gravel stuff stu, like around claewen res etc ?
User avatar
Bearbonesnorm
Posts: 23943
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 8:53 pm
Location: my own little world

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Bearbonesnorm »

reckon the moto x will be ok on the gravel stuff stu, like around claewen res etc ?
I'd have thought they'd be fine on anything other than wet grass / mud.
May the bridges you burn light your way
Stumpym4
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2015 9:12 pm

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Stumpym4 »

Stumpym4 wrote:Pinnacle Ramin 3 plus, bit concerned about pedaling 3 inch rubber on tarmac climbs :( .. gonna be a slog !
any recommendations on different rubber that will roll easier ?
Or my other option is the arkose with 40mm nanos on ?
ianfitz
Posts: 3642
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:33 pm

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by ianfitz »

Stumpym4 wrote:
Stumpym4 wrote:Pinnacle Ramin 3 plus, bit concerned about pedaling 3 inch rubber on tarmac climbs :( .. gonna be a slog !
any recommendations on different rubber that will roll easier ?
Or my other option is the arkose with 40mm nanos on ?
On those steep mid Wales Tarmac climbs it's not the rubber that's the limiting factor.
Image
User avatar
Wilkyboy
Posts: 176
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2017 6:39 pm
Location: Flat, flat Cambridge

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Wilkyboy »

26-inch full-bounce MTB. Over 20 years old, so not particularly light, but still a lovely bike, even if it looks a bit dated :-bd

2.35 Hans Dampf on the front and 2.10 Nobby Nic on the rear — that's as big as the frame and suspension fork allow. I've no idea if these are good tyres, but I'm hoping they'll be good enough.

Probably 14kg just for the bike, plus 7-8kg of stuff — this will be my first, so I can't even attempt a bit of "TLS". I'll just have to pedal harder ...
Asposium
Posts: 1632
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2016 5:39 pm
Location: Southampton

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Asposium »

26 hard tail.
gravel bike not built yet
User avatar
Matt
Posts: 1634
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 10:31 am

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by Matt »

For every previous years WRT I've been in Fat mode

After months of training for London Marathon I'll be in medium mode this year!
User avatar
MarkW
Posts: 141
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 12:07 pm
Location: Malvern, Previously South Wales

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by MarkW »

I was hoping to go rigid b+ having ordered a Shand in Feb. Unfortunately its not going to be ready in time so it's stardard 29er hardtail for me. 2.3"
AlexGold wrote:Hope my CX with 35mm Smart Sams will work, as it's that or the road bike with 23mm slicks!
Rather you than me. You may struggle on some parts of my route.
User avatar
littlegirlbunny
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 9:22 am

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by littlegirlbunny »

Me n the other half will be on 29ers with normal MTB tyres. I run a steel Sturdy frame with 2.3s - Specialized Slaughter on the back and a Specialized Control tyre on the front.

Image

The other half will be running his Specialized Stumpjumper Evo hardtail with 2.0 Bontragner mud tyres.

Cos that's what we have, and that'll do the job. :-bd
User avatar
macinblack
Posts: 644
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 8:02 am

Re: Fat, medium or thin for the wrt?

Post by macinblack »

Genesis Longitude 27.5 - Still with the 2.8 Trailblazers - Might even clean it just for the occasion, maybe.
Post Reply