Any comments on either?
Rim is a Mavic ex729*
It's for a 67.5+er experiment. Been running 69er with a 29x2.4 Ardent up front, a slightly smaller diameter than that would be good probably
Don't need a proper mud tyre but don't want to die at the slightest hint of dampness either
*I know someone is going to say I need bigger but Mavic spec 1.5-3.0 tyres (int 29mm ext 36mm) and I need the ability to fit a 2.0 touring tyre
Rekon 2.8 or Chronicle 3.0? (in 27.5 size)
Moderators: Bearbonesnorm, Taylor, Chew
-
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:04 pm
- Location: Scottish Borders
Re: Rekon 2.8 or Chronicle 3.0? (in 27.5 size)
New 2.6 rekon and forekasters look interesting.
-
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:04 pm
- Location: Scottish Borders
Re: Rekon 2.8 or Chronicle 3.0? (in 27.5 size)
If anyone ever comes back and reads this a 2.8 Maxxis Rekon on a 29mm internal rim measures up at 2.6"...no idea what it would measure on a bigger rim. It's nowhere near the diameter of a 29x2.4 Ardent so I don't think it's the biggest 2.8 anyway.
67.5+er is my new niche
67.5+er is my new niche
- pushbikemike
- Posts: 558
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:14 pm
- Location: Borders
Re: Rekon 2.8 or Chronicle 3.0? (in 27.5 size)
restlessnative wrote:67.5+er is my new niche